A manifesto shared by a pro-China personality falsely claimed that the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement between the Philippines and the United States is banned under the constitution.
CLAIM: The Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement is an executive agreement banned under the Philippine Constitution.
RATING: FALSE
A manifesto shared by a pro-China personality falsely claimed that the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA) between the Philippines and the United States is banned under the constitution.
In a post on X, Manila Times columnist Anna Malindog-Uy shared the “Manifesto Against US-BBM Proxy War” on April 24.
The manifesto wrongly claimed that the “EDCA is an executive agreement banned under the Philippine Constitution, Section 25, Article XVIII.”
On Jan. 12, 2016, the Supreme Court, voting 10-4, upheld the legality of EDCA between the Philippines and the United States.
The decision was penned by then-Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno.
The high court did say that the EDCA is an “international agreement that allows the presence in the Philippines of foreign military bases, troops and facilities, and thus requires that the three requisites under Section 25, Article XVIII be complied with.”
The tribunal also upheld the authority of the president to enter into an executive agreement on foreign military bases, troops, or facilities if: (a) it “is not the principal agreement that first allowed their entry or presence in the Philippines,” or (b) it merely aims to implement an existing law or treaty.”
It added that the President alone had the choice to enter into the EDCA either through an executive agreement or a treaty.
The high court also said that “executive agreements may cover the matter of foreign military forces if it involves detail adjustments of previously existing international agreements.”
“As it is, EDCA is not constitutionally infirm. As an executive agreement, it remains consistent with existing laws and treaties that it purports to implement.” the decision concluded. Rommel F. Lopez
PressOne.PH is a verified signatory of the Code of Principles of the International Fact -Checking Network (IFCN) at Poynter. The code of principles of the International Fact-Checking Network is a series of commitments organizations abide by to promote excellence in fact-checking. We believe nonpartisan and transparent fact-checking can be a powerful instrument of accountability journalism..
PressOne.PH believes that fact-checking is essential to combating misinformation and disinformation, and in informing and educating citizens and voters. Read more of PressOne.PH’s Fact-Checking Policy by clicking here.
The public is welcome to send feedback or requests for fact-checks at factcheck@pressone.ph.
If you believe PressOne.PH is violating the Code of Principles of the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN), you may submit a complaint directly to the IFCN website: https://ifcncodeofprinciples.poynter.org/complaints-policy
FACT-CHECK: Interaction between lawmaker and Ong happened in House, not Senate
A Facebook “reel” falsely claimed that the interaction between Rep. Dan Fernandez and a suspected Philippine offshore gaming operator, Cassandra Ong, happened in the Senate.
FACT-CHECK: Online health advocate Doc Willie is still alive
Facebook page “Showbizfinds” falsely claimed that Filipino health advocate and former vice presidential candidate Dr. Willie Ong had passed away, allegedly due to complications from his illness.
FACT-CHECK: Photo of an airport in West PH Sea is fake
A Facebook user posted a reel containing a photo of a supposed airport and falsely claimed that it was located in the West Philippine Sea.
Is China changing its tactics in WPS?
It’s worth watching if China’s tactics in the South China Sea will change after the Hasa-Hasa incident on Sept. 27.
FACT-CHECK: Photo of an airport in West PH Sea is fake
A Facebook user posted a reel containing a photo of a supposed airport and falsely claimed that it was located in the West Philippine Sea.
Do we have funds for military modernization?
The Philippines has no ambition to match the military capability of Singapore, the most advanced in the region, and superpower China.