Vitug’s article was written was eight months ago; Marcos is now president, and heads of state enjoy diplomatic immunity under international law.
CLAIM: Veteran journalist Marites Vitug erred when she wrote in January 2022 that Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr. couldn’t go to the United States because he would be arrested by authorities.
RATING: MISSING CONTEXT
Pro-Marcos social media users left out crucial context when they revived a statement by veteran journalist Marites Vitug in January 2022 that Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr. couldn’t go to the United States because he would be arrested by authorities.
Sans any context, Twitter user @jcpunongbrgy heckled Vitug on Sept. 20, 2022, pointing out that President Marcos was already in the US for a visit.
“Hello Marites Vitug… Asa US pa din ang pangulo. Kaw ba? (Hello Marites Vitug. The president is still in the US. How about you?)”
The tweet has so far gained more than 20 retweets and a hundred likes but has the potential to extend its reach given the hostility of Marcos supporters to the news media. On Facebook, it was shared by user Benjie Contreras Jr., and has gained more than 350 engagements, 42 comments, and 20 shares.
In response, Vitug posted a key term on her Facebook page: diplomatic immunity.
Vitug did not err when she wrote in January 2022 that Marcos risked arrest in the US over a contempt case involving a human rights class suit.
That was eight months ago; Marcos is now president, and heads of state enjoy diplomatic immunity under international law.
The 1969 UN Convention on Special Missions states that: “The Head of the sending State, when he leads a special mission, shall enjoy in the receiving State or in a third State the facilities, privileges and immunities accorded by international law to Heads of State on an official visit.”
The convention was adopted by the UN General Assembly of the United Nations on Dec. 8, 1969. It entered into force on June 21, 1985.
This fact-check was produced by PressOne.PH as part of a fact-checking grant from the Philippine Fact-Checker Incubator (PFCI) Project. The PFCI supports news organizations to allow them to meet global fact-checking standards under the International Fact-Checking Network’s Code of Principles.
PressOne.PH believes that fact-checking is essential to combating misinformation and disinformation, and in informing and educating citizens and voters. Read more of PressOne.PH’s Fact-Checking Policy by clicking here.
The public is welcome to send feedback or requests for fact-checks at factcheck@pressone.ph.
FACT CHECK: YouTube channel falsely claims Marcos Sr. declared Filipinos as co-owners and co-beneficiaries of his wealth
The late dictator entrusted all of his properties only to his wife and his children.
FACT-CHECK: Video falsely claims PH so rich during Marcos regime no one slept on streets
In a TikTok video, a man talks about the country’s economy during the Marcos Sr. regime, repeating the “golden age” claim that had already been debunked by fact-checking sites.
FACT CHECK: Duterte makes wrong claim on how confi, intel funds were spent
Former president Rodrigo Duterte falsely claimed in his TV program on SMNI that the Office of the Vice President (OVP) did not spend P125 million in confidential and intelligence funds (CIF).